Law office of
Kathleen Flynn

Call today for a
free consultation
  • Not Specified
  • Testimonials

    I was homeless at the time I was searching for an attorney and was denied six months prior to obtaining Ms. Flynn, who reviewed my denial notice immediately and said we need to file an appeal. I was granted another hearing date and I was very nervous, but the attorney that represented me from Ms. Flynn's office was so nice. I was told to let her know when my anxiety comes on and she was very patient with me. I had a panic attack before the hearing was over. I’m so appreciative of the staff as well as Ms. Flynn. Her office never let me down and I’m so, so thankful. I’m able to get the medication and the therapy I need for my illness. I thank God that he placed me around people that cared and were able to help me.

    — Carla Rimmer
  • RSS New on Our Blog

    • National Minority Mental Health Month July 29, 2016
      During the month of July, we commemorate National Minority Mental Health Awareness Month following the 2008 resolution by Congress. This resolution honors the legacy of Bebe Moore Campbell, an award winning African-American author, journalist, and teacher, who helped to destigmatize how minorities approach mental health issues in their communities. Based upon the 2000 […]
    • Raising Breast Cancer awareness in African-American women February 14, 2016
      At a past fundraiser for the Sisters Network in Atlanta, GA, I learned of the need for breast cancer awareness in the African American community. Breast cancer is the most common cancer amongst all women. cancer/dcpc/data/ women.htm Considering women under age 45, however, the mortality rate of breast cancer is higher for African-Americans than […]
    • Diabetes: How to win a social security disability case before an Adjudicator or ALJ December 10, 2015
      The Social Security Administration (SSA) eliminated Medical Listing 9.08. For complications from diabetes, this listing previously resulted in a finding of disability at step three of the sequential evaluation process for social security disability claims. In fact, effective June 7, 2015, there are no specific endocrine disorder listings anymore for adults. One exception is […]
    • Representatives have a duty to submit all evidence in social security disability cases to the Social Security Administration October 15, 2015
      Beginning in April 2015, the Social Security Administration (SSA) created new internal Hallex regulations requiring representatives to submit all existing evidence related to a client’s mental or physical impairments. In the past, representatives were not required to submit evidence that could adversely impact a client’s case. During hearings held at the Office of Disability Adjudication […]
    • SOCIAL SECURITY’s 80th ANNIVERSARY August 5, 2015
      Marking a Social Security Milestone August 14, 2015 is the 80th anniversary of Social Security. Few Americans working today can remember a time when Social Security wasn’t part of the social fabric of America. Since the Social Security retirement program was enacted under Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1935, it has expanded in important ways. In […]

SSA Representatives and Claimants will no longer know the name of the ALJs adjudicating their cases until they walk into the Hearing Room

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has begun effectuating its policy of concealing the name of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) from the attorney and the claimant until they enter the hearing room. According to the National Association of Social Security Representatives, (NOSSCR), the reason for the policy change is to prevent some representatives from “judge shopping,” by declining a National Hearing Center (NHC) video hearing, with an ALJ in Falls Church, VA, once the ALJ’s identity is revealed.

As far as the Atlanta area, in the past, video hearings with ALJs from Falls Church, VA were held at the Marietta Social Security District Office. However, once the Office of Adjudication and Review (ODAR) opened in Covington, GA, these video hearings were discontinued. Many of us were relieved, since the quality of the video was poor. Secondly, the ALJ did not have an opportunity to view our clients in person, which many attorneys feel is necessary for the ALJ to observe a client’s mental demeanor and/or physical limitations. So, given the fact that areas such as Atlanta no longer have video hearings with the NHC ALJs, SSA’s policy of not revealing the ALJ is nonsensical.

Why do attorneys and claimants want to know the name of the ALJ before walking into the hearing room? First, the way ALJs conduct social security disability hearings vary greatly. Some ALJs require the attorney to ask a majority of questions, whereas other ALJs prefer to ask the questions themselves. If an attorney knows the ALJ asks a majority of questions, he/she can prepare the client to answer the questions that a particular Judge usually asks. Each Judge has a different personality, as well, and telling a client what to expect from a particular ALJ helps diffuse the stress of testifying.

We have another issue in the Atlanta area. Hearings are scheduled and hearing notices are sent by mail without contacting the representative or claimant about availability. Unfortunately, some ODAR clerks are not always entering the hearings they schedule in SSA’s centralized computer system nor are they always checking for conflicts on the system. Then, multiple conflicting hearings are scheduled on the same day, and attorneys no longer know which ALJ’s clerk to contact to address the problem.

Finally, vocational experts, who testify about a claimant’s past work at the hearing and answer questions about which jobs a claimant can or cannot perform in the regional or national economy based upon certain physical and/or mental limitations, are also unhappy with the change in policy. Their case preparation also varies based upon the type of questions asked by a particular Judge. Some may not receive CDs with the vocational evidence from ODAR and no longer know which ODAR clerk to contact for a copy. Nor are all the ALJs pleased with the policy change, because some ALJs, for example, require a prehearing brief.

NOSSCR has alerted members that a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request case is now pending in the Eastern District Court of Missouri, and research is underway to examine the possibility of a constitutional challenge of the SSA Commissioner’s new policy. Many representatives have contacted their Senators and Representatives asking for a reinstatement of the practice of providing the name of the ALJ presiding over a client’s case. Claimants should do the same. If you have any questions, please contact the Law Offices of Kathleen Flynn at 404-479-4431 or please visit our website at