Law office of
Kathleen Flynn

Call today for a
free consultation
  • Not Specified
  • Testimonials

    "Ms. Flynn did exactly what she said she would, and it was a pleasant experience. I even recommended my neighbor to her for help with their SSI case. Thank you for all your help."

    — Anonymous Smith
  • RSS New on Our Blog

    • During the Covid-19 pandemic, the Social Security Administration is not acting on the following cases: June 22, 2020
      During the Covid-19 pandemic from April 10, 2020 until further notice, SSA is NOT acting on the following cases based upon NOSSCR’s June 2020 newsletter. 1. Medical Continuing Disability Reviews (CDRs) -This is good news for any adult or child with a physical or mental condition (s), who was previously awarded social security disability […]
    • National Minority Mental Health Month July 29, 2016
      During the month of July, we commemorate National Minority Mental Health Awareness Month following the 2008 resolution by Congress. This resolution honors the legacy of Bebe Moore Campbell, an award winning African-American author, journalist, and teacher, who helped to destigmatize how minorities approach mental health issues in their communities. Based upon the 2000 […]
    • Raising Breast Cancer awareness in African-American women February 14, 2016
      At a past fundraiser for the Sisters Network in Atlanta, GA, I learned of the need for breast cancer awareness in the African American community. Breast cancer is the most common cancer amongst all women. cancer/dcpc/data/ women.htm Considering women under age 45, however, the mortality rate of breast cancer is higher for African-Americans than […]
    • Diabetes: How to win a social security disability case before an Adjudicator or ALJ December 10, 2015
      The Social Security Administration (SSA) eliminated Medical Listing 9.08. For complications from diabetes, this listing previously resulted in a finding of disability at step three of the sequential evaluation process for social security disability claims. In fact, effective June 7, 2015, there are no specific endocrine disorder listings anymore for adults. One exception is […]
    • Representatives have a duty to submit all evidence in social security disability cases to the Social Security Administration October 15, 2015
      Beginning in April 2015, the Social Security Administration (SSA) created new internal Hallex regulations requiring representatives to submit all existing evidence related to a client’s mental or physical impairments. In the past, representatives were not required to submit evidence that could adversely impact a client’s case. During hearings held at the Office of Disability Adjudication […]

Filing Subsequent SSI (Title XVI) and SSDI (Title II, DIB) Applications

In the past, whenever one of our clients received an unfavorable decision at a hearing by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the Law Office of Kathleen Flynn would appeal the claim to the Appeals Council (AC), as well as file a new application for the client. If the client won on a subsequent SSI (Title XVI) and/or SSDI (Title II, DIB) application, it could, in my opinion, improve the chances of a remand from the Appeals Council or from the next level of review by US District Court, which is where social security disability cases denied by the Appeals Council (AC) are appealed.

In a startling reversal, the Social Security Administration (SSA) issued Social Security Ruling 11-1p, which revises SSA’s prior policy for filing subsequent applications where a prior application is pending at the Appeals Council. 76 Fed. Reg. 45309 (July 28, 2011). Now, according to SSR 11-1p, which is effective July 28, 2011, SSA “will no longer process a subsequent disability claim if you already have a claim under the same title and of the same type pending in our administrative review process.” This SSR does not change SSA’s policy when an appeal is pending in US District Court. A claimant may still file a subsequent application while a previous application is being reviewed by the US District Court. According to the Social Security Administration, SSR 11-1p will not apply to a subsequent application that was filed BEFORE July 28, 2011, while a previous application is awaiting review at the Appeals Council.

This is disadvantageous to the claimant (s), who had “2 bites at the apple” earlier in the appeals process by filing both a new application and a Request for Review of the ALJ denial to the AC. One has to wonder what SSA’s motives are for doing this. Was the decision for financial reasons or due to difficulty tracking both cases? In our experience, there were instances when various SSA offices did not seem to know where the previous application and the subsequent application were. Unfortunately, more thought should have been given by SSA to the suffering claimants, who have to, sometimes, wait over a year for a decision from the AC. It seems the agency put their interests first.

For more information, please contact the Law Office of Kathleen Flynn at 404-479-4431 or